If you listened to Mark Dever's message (below) you would have heard that Capitol Hill Church reverted back to a church covenant from 1878.
Why did they do that?
(In full disclosure, Dever also said in the message that he personally abstains from the use of alcohol.)
Now this sparks a couple of questions:
1) Are church covenants important?
2) If so, should they only reflect the scripture or should they contain cultural biases and/or particular interpretations of scripture on secondary theological matters?
I want to know what you think. Comment please! Do so anonymously if you are worried a church deacon or some other busybody may read what you write.
posted by Arkansas Razorbaptist at 4/25/2006 09:02:00 AM